§ The following Question stood upon the Order Paper:
§ 19. Mr. DODDSTo ask the Secretary of State for War if he will make a statement on the suspension of three officers of the 6th Battalion, The Queen's Royal Regiment, Territorial Army, following an incident during the third day of the atom exercise "Dover Castle" held on Salisbury Plain in July last.
§ Mr. MellishOn a point of order. Question No. 19 raises a matter primarily concerning my constituency, on which I 186 have been working extremely hard for the past two months in getting private information which I wish to lay before the Secretary of State for War. As it is not a matter which should be bandied across the Floor of the House, may I appeal to you, Mr. Speaker, to ask what course a Member should take?
§ Mr. DoddsSince I am concerned with an officer who is a constituent of mine and has asked me to raise the Question, why cannot this "nosy parker" mind his own business?
§ Mr. SpeakerHon. Member should not use such expressions about each other. In reply to the hon. Member for Bermondsey (Mr. Mellish), the Question is in order and is on the Paper in the name of the hon. Member for Erith and Crayford (Mr. Dodds), and I must call it.
§ Mr. MellishSurely, the hon. Member for Erith and Crayford should be the last person to call anybody a "nosy parker" when he spends all his time watching other people at work.
§ Mr. SpeakerMr. Dodds.
§ Mr. HeadDuring the whole of camp and not just during the exercise referred to it was considered that the battalion was not up to the standard of efficiency expected. The divisional commander decided to suspend from command three of the company commanders and to call for special reports on them. These steps were taken to improve the general efficiency of the battalion and are not solely connected with the incident on the last day of the exercise.
§ Mr. DoddsWhen is a decision likely to be made? This is causing a lot of harm to the Territorial Army in my district.
§ Mr. MellishIs the Secretary of State aware that there are other details of which he should be made aware before any decision is taken concerning these three officers, who, I think, have been unjustly treated? Will the right hon. 187 Gentleman now afford to me a private interview so that he may have the details which I am anxious for him to have?