HC Deb 15 November 1927 vol 210 cc818-9
39. Colonel DAY

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether in releasing Oscar Slater, he proposes to set up an inquiry into the evidence produced at the trial?

Sir J. GILMOUR

Had the conviction in this case taken place after 31st October, 1926, I should have had power to remit questions regarding it to the Court of Criminal Appeal under the provisions of Section 16 of the Criminal Appeal (Scotland) Act, 1926. If I can obtain from Parliament the legislation necessary to extend the Act so as to enable me to refer this case under the provisions mentioned, I am prepared to take that course. A single Clause Bill would be all that would be necessary, but at this stage of the Session, I could not hope to get it unless the House is prepared to pass the Measure by general consent and without discussion.

Mr. RAMSAY MacDONALD

May I ask, arising out of that question, whether in view of the somewhat unfortunate position in which this case has been left, a very special attempt might not be made through the usual channels to arrange for the passing of a Bill? I ask that question specially.

Mr. HARDIE

On a point of Order. This question deals with the relation between the Secretary of State for Scotland and a released prisoner. Last week I put down a question in relation to a prisoner now in Glasgow who was put in prison because he refused to go to Barr-hill court house, but that question was twice refused at the Table. Seeing this question on the Paper, I should like to know upon what grounds my question was refused.

Mr. SPEAKER

So far as I recollect, the question submitted by the hon. Member was not of the same nature as this question; but I will look at it again.

Sir J. GILMOUR

In reply to the right hon. Gentleman the Leader of the Opposition, so far as the Government are concerned they welcome the suggestion he has made.

Mr. NAYLOR

Is it intended to pay Slater any compensation for wrongful imprisonment?