44. Sir F. HALLasked the Minister of Transport if, at the conclusion of the railway dispute, trouble arose among the Great Eastern Railway locomotive men at Peterborough owing to the retention of two retired drivers who came to the assistance of the Governfent during the strike; if instructions were given for the dismissal of these two men in order to settle the difficulty; and if this action was a breach of the promises made with respect to voluntary workers who rendered conspicuous service during the attempted hold-up of the community?
§ Sir E. GEDDESI had not previously heard of any trouble amongst the Great Eastern railwaymen at Peterborough over the strike settlement. But as the hon. Member is aware no promise of permanent employment was made to the voluntary workers.
Sir F. HALLDoes the right hon. Gentleman deny the truth of the statement which appears in the question?
§ Sir E. GEDDESI have no particular knowledge of the statement other than the question itself, but it does not appear to me to affect the settlement. No promise of permanent employment was given.
Sir F. HALLHas the right hon. Gentleman taken any steps to inquire as to the truth of the statement?
§ Sir E. GEDDESNo, Sir; because it does not affect the permanent settlement.
Sir F. HALLThen is the House to understand that some of His Majesty's Government intend to take no notice of questions on the Paper?
§ Sir E. GEDDESEvery inquiry necessary in order to give a reply was made, but in this particular case no question which arises on the settlement is involved.