HC Deb 28 June 1906 vol 159 cc1129-30
MR. CLEMENT EDWARDS (Denbigh District)

I beg to ask the Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies if, when the terms of the Transvaal Labour Ordinance were first posted at the recruiting stations in China, the Chinese † See (4) Debates, clviii, 1361. equivalent for tremble and obey constituted part of such posters.

MR. CHURCHILL

The posting of the Labour Ordinance in China did not constitute a proclamation under the local authority; and, in the circumstances, it seems not unlikely, though the Secretary of State has no certain information, that the admonitions which usually conclude official proclamations did not form a part of the notice.

MR. J. WARD

Have any further requests been made for repatriation beyond the jury of twelve already announced?

MR. CHURCHILL

Yes; forty-three labourers in all have applied according to the latest report, and we are expecting a further report very shortly.

MR. CLEMENT EDWARDS

What is the distinction between an ordinary proclamation and one issued under the Labour Ordinance?

MR. CHURCHILL

I suppose there is a difference between notices issued by mine-owners inviting labour and those issued under the authority of the Government.

MR. CLEMENT EDWARDS

Was not the Labour Ordinance a Government document?

MR. CHURCHILL

Those published in China certainly were not.

MR. FLAVIN (Kerry, N.)

What is the use of sending forty-throe labourers back to China if you admit 8,000 more into South Africa?

[No Answer was returned.]