Committee concerns steps

There are 58 steps.

A step forms part of a procedure to which a work package may be subject.

Step	Actualisation count
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended a debate on a substantive motion take place during period A (House of Commons)	2
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended a general debate (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) recommended the treaty should not be ratified (House of Commons)	0
Business and Trade Committee (BTC) reported the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Commons)	0
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee reported the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Commons)	0
Concerns raised by the Business and Trade Committee (BTC) (House of Commons)	0
Concerns raised by the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee (House of Commons)	0
Concerns raised by the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRRC) (House of Lords)	0
Concerns raised by the Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) (House of Commons)	0
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRRC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Lords)	0
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRRC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Lords)	1
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee (DPRRC) reported the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Lords)	1
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the European Affairs Committee (EAC) (House of Lords)	2
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the European Union Committee (House of Lords)	16
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the International Agreements Committee (IAC) (House of Lords)	22
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) (House of Commons and House of Lords)	1
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords)	464
Drawn to the special attention of the House by the Select Committee on Statutory Instruments (SCSI) (House of Commons)	68
Drawn to the special attention of the Houses by the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) (House of Commons and House of Lords)	742
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee made recommendations about how the treaty should be implemented (House of Commons)	1
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee made recommendations about what lessons could be learnt for future treaties (House of Commons)	1
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
European Affairs Committee (EAC) called for a debate on the treaty (House of Lords)	1
European Union Committee called for a debate on the treaty (House of Lords)	2
Home Affairs Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Information paragraph provided by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords)	1913
International Agreements Committee (IAC) called for a debate on the treaty (House of Lords)	11
International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended Members should vote against ratification in any debate on a substantive motion during period A (House of Commons)	1
International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended a debate on a substantive motion take place during period A (House of Commons)	1
International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended a general debate (House of Commons)	1
International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons)	0
International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended the treaty should not be ratified (House of Commons)	0
International Trade Committee (ITC) requested the recommended debate on a substantive motion take place during period A (House of Commons)	1
Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended a draft Order be laid in an amended form (House of Commons and House of Lords)	6
Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended a draft remedial order be laid and the Government reconsider the drafting of the order (House of Commons and House of Lords)	1
Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons and House of Lords)	0
Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended the Order be laid under the urgent procedure in an amended form (House of Commons and House of Lords)	0
Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended the draft Order should not be approved (House of Commons and House of Lords)	0
Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended the treaty should be debated in both Houses (House of Commons and House of Lords)	0
Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) recommended the treaty should not be ratified (House of Commons and House of Lords)	0
Preliminary report by the International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended that a debate be held during period A (House of Commons)	1
Preliminary report by the International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended that objection period A be extended (House of Commons)	1
Preliminary report by the International Trade Committee (ITC) recommended that, should period A not be extended, there should be a debate on a substantive motion during period A (House of Commons)	1
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Recommendations made by the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) (House of Lords)	0
Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) recommended the instrument should be upgraded to the super-affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Regulatory Reform Committee (RRC) reported the instrument is not appropriate to be made (House of Commons)	0
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	0
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (SLSC) makes recommendations on published draft (House of Lords)	3
Transport Committee recommended the instrument should follow the affirmative procedure (House of Commons)	1

Step collection identifier

https://id.parliament.uk/7CBVQcZF

SPARQL queries used by this page

PREFIX id: <https://id.parliament.uk/>
          PREFIX : <https://id.parliament.uk/schema/>
          PREFIX rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
          PREFIX rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>
          SELECT ?StepCollection ?stepCollectionName ?procedure ?procedureName ?House ?HouseName ?StepCollectionMembership ?procedureStep ?procedureStepName ?procedureStepType ?procedureStepTypeName ?procedureSteplegislature ?procedureSteplegislatureName ?procedureStepCommonsId ?procedureStepLordsId (COUNT(?bi) AS ?biCount)  WHERE {

?StepCollection a :ProcedureStepCollection;
                      :name ?stepCollectionName.
          optional {?StepCollection :procedureStepCollectionHasProcedure ?procedure.
              ?procedure :name ?procedureName.}
          optional {?StepCollection :procedureStepCollectionHasHouse ?House.
              ?House :name ?HouseName.}
            filter (?StepCollection IN (id:7CBVQcZF))
           ?StepCollection :procedureStepCollectionHasProcedureStepCollectionMembership ?StepCollectionMembership.
              ?StepCollectionMembership :procedureStepCollectionMembershipHasProcedureStep ?procedureStep.
       OPTIONAL { ?procedureStep :procedureStepHasBusinessItem ?bi }
              ?procedureStep :name ?procedureStepName;
                             :procedureStepHasProcedureStepType ?procedureStepType.
              ?procedureStepType :name ?procedureStepTypeName. 
           optional { ?procedureStep :procedureStepInLegislature ?procedureSteplegislature.
                ?procedureSteplegislature :name ?procedureSteplegislatureName.}
             optional {   ?procedureStep :procedureStepHasHouse ?procedureStepCommonsId.
                filter (?procedureStepCommonsId IN (id:1AFu55Hs))}
              optional{    ?procedureStep :procedureStepHasHouse ?procedureStepLordsId.
                filter (?procedureStepLordsId IN (id:WkUWUBMx))}
          } 
        Group by ?StepCollection ?stepCollectionName ?procedure ?procedureName ?House ?HouseName ?StepCollectionMembership ?procedureStep ?procedureStepName ?procedureStepType ?procedureStepTypeName ?procedureSteplegislature ?procedureSteplegislatureName ?procedureStepCommonsId ?procedureStepLordsId
        Order by ?procedureStepName