§ 4. Mr. Wattasked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he will take steps to transfer responsibility for social work departments currently exercised by regional authorities to relevant district authorities; and if he will make a statement.
§ Mr. McElhoneNo, Sir.
§ Mr. WattIs the Minister claiming that he is unaware of the constant anomalies which crop up because of the continued division of responsibility between the regions—which are responsible for social work—and the districts—which are responsible for housing? Is not he aware of the hurt that this is doing to the care of the elderly in Scotland? Is it not time that he gave this matter more urgent attention?
§ Mr. McElhoneI am not aware of the concern that has been expressed by the hon. Gentleman regarding the connection between the regions and the districts. My understanding is that this is working quite well. Nevertheless, the real need with regard to the elderly is not so much to reorganise local government as to reorganise society in order to return to the first principle of caring for the elderly and the young.
§ Mr. Buchanan-SmithWhen will we have a decision on the responsibility for List D schools?
§ Mr. McElhoneThat matter is under active consideration at the present time.
§ Mr. Buchanan-SmithToo long.
§ Mr. McElhoneIt may be too long, but, nevertheless, we would be accused of riding roughshod over many interests 448 if we took an early decision. At the present time, many consultations are taking place with various bodies throughout Scotland.
§ Mr. Alexander FletcherDoes the Minister agree that the working of the 1973 Act should not be looked at piecemeal? If any minor adjustments are necessary, would it not be better to set up a high-powered commission for this purpose and to receive the benefit of a report?
§ Mr. McElhoneMy own view is that we should not set up any more commissions to consider the reorganisation of local government. Any reorganisation that might take place is best left to the Assembly.