HC Deb 11 November 1971 vol 825 cc1381-2

Ordered,

That a Select Committee be appointed to consider every Statutory Instrument, every Scheme or Amendment of a Scheme, requiring approval by Statutory Instrument, and every draft of such an Instrument, Scheme or Amendment, being an Instrument, Scheme, Amendment or Draft which is laid before the House and upon which proceedings may be or might have been taken in the House in pursuance of any Act of Parliament, every other general Statutory Instrument, and every Order which is subject to Special Parliamentary Procedure, with a view to determining whether the special attention of the House should be drawn to it on any of the following grounds:—

  1. (1) that it imposes a charge on the public revenues or contains provisions requiring payments to be made to the Exchequer or any Government department or to any local or public authority in consideration of any licence or consent or of any services to be rendered, or prescribes the amount of any such charge or payments;
  2. (2) that it is made in pursuance of an enactment containing specific provisions excluding it from challenge in the courts either at all times or after the expiration of a specified period;
  3. (3) that it appears to make some unusual or unexpected use of the powers conferred by the Statute under which it is made;
  4. (4) that it purports to have retrospective effect where the parent Statute confers no express authority so to provide;
  5. (5) that there appears to have been unjustifiable delay in the publication or in the laying of it before Parliament;
  6. (6) that there appears to have been unjustifiable delay in sending a notification to Mr. Speaker under the proviso to subsection (1) of section four of the Statutory Instruments Act 1946, where an Instrument has come into operation before it has been laid before Parliament;
  7. (7) that for any special reason its form or purport calls for elucidation;
  8. (8) that the drafting of it appears to he defective;
or on any other ground which does not impinge on its merits or on the policy behind it; and to report their decision with the reasons there-of in any particular case:—and the Committee was nominated of Mr. Ronald Bell, Mr. Richard Body, Mr. Albert Booth, Mr. Jack Dunnett, Mr. Michael Havers, Mr. Arthur Latham, Mr. Ernie Money, Mr. Ronald King Murray, Mr. Ian Percival, Mr. David Waddington, and Mr. Walder.

Ordered,

That the Committee shall have the assistance of the Counsel to Mr. Speaker:

Ordered,

That the Committee have power to sit not- withstanding any Adjournment of the House and to report from time to time:

Ordered,

That the Committee have power to require any Government department concerned to submit a memorandum explaining any Instrument or other Document which may be under their consideration or to depute a representative to appear before them as a Witness for the purpose of explaining any such Instrument or other Document:

Ordered,

That Three be the Quorum of the Committee:

Ordered,

That it be an Instruction to the Committee that before reporting that the special attention of the House be drawn to any Instrument or other Document the Committee do afford to any Government department concerned therewith an opportunity of furnishing orally or in writing such explanations as the department think fit:

Ordered,

That the Committee have power to report to the House from time to time any Memoranda submitted or other evidence given to the Committee by any Government department in explanation of any Instrument or other Document:

Ordered,

That the Committee have power to take evidence, written or oral, from Her Majesty's Stationery Office, relating to the printing and publication of any Instrument or other Document—[Mr. Rossi.]

Forward to