§ 36. Mr. Warrenasked the Secretary of State for the Environment, if he will make a further statement on the progress of negotiations for the Channel Tunnel.
§ 61. Mr. Sheldonasked the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will now make a statement on the Channel Tunnel.
§ Mr. PeytonI hope to be able to make a statement shortly.
§ Mr. WarrenIs my right hon. Friend aware that whereas I have every hope that this venture will go ahead, I hope that during the very protracted negotiations the Minister and his colleagues will in no way interfere with the current communication links with the anticipated terminal area in this country? I have in mind particularly the south coast rail link via Hastings to Aldershot.
§ Mr. PeytonI have no desire to interfere with existing communication links.
§ Mr. SheldonSince the design of this tunnel is now at least eight years out of date, because that is the period which has elapsed since its inauguration, will the right hon. Gentleman look at this again and see whether he can come up with a more modern design? Secondly, will he publish to the House the latest traffic estimates which I believe have been undertaken by his Department and which have not so far been published?
§ Mr. PeytonAs to the latter part of the question, I will certainly consider the need to produce a document for the convenience of the House. As to the original design, there will, of course, be a period of more intensive and detailed examination of the project preceding construction. This awaits the decision of the two Governments at the moment.
§ Mr. CrouchWill the Minister bear in mind that there are many, including myself, who think that this Victorian idea of a Channel Tunnel should be forgotten 1074 as soon as possible and the book closed? Is he aware that while it still remains open, the priority for road development in Kent is absolutely lamentable?
§ Mr. PeytonI think the project has been examined once or twice since Victorian times. In saying that, I would not wish prematurely to commit the Government to any decision.
§ Mr. DeedesWill my right hon. Friend bear in mind that he could make an invaluable contribution to the policy of retrenchment upon which the Chancellor of the Exchequer is now engaged by deciding not to have this tunnel at all?
§ Mr. PeytonI duly note my right hon. Friend's observations.