§ 33. Mr. Rossiasked the Minister of Public Building and Works what is his policy regarding the employment of building workers by public bodies by direct labour on London building sites; and if he will make a statement.
§ 11. Mr. Grantasked the Minister of Public Building and Works what is his policy regarding the employment of building workers by public bodies by direct labour; and whether he will make a statement.
§ Mr. MellishIt is a management responsibility to make the most advantageous arrangements. So far as my own Department is concerned, I consider that there is a place for both directly employed labour and contractors.
§ Mr. RossiCan the Minister state what place he considers the Southwark direct labour department has in view of the fact that it has overspent nearly £1 million on the North Peckham development site, for which the Minister himself is partly responsible?
§ Mr. MellishThe hon. Member is asking the wrong Minister the wrong question at the wrong time. Otherwise he is in order. He should address his question to my right hon. Friend the Minister of Housing and Local Government.
§ Mr. ManuelIs my right hon. Friend aware that quite a campaign is being waged on this question by Aims of Industry, which is reflected in the questions being put by hon. Members opposite?
§ Mr. MellishI know about Aims of Industry, of course. It is always opposed to direct labour. The tragedy in this argument is that, by imputation, nothing is good about directly employed labour and everything is good about contractors 1236 —when the truth is that there is a bit of bad about both.
§ Mr. AshtonIs my right hon. Friend aware that the public works department in Sheffield has made a profit of £14 million in the last 12 years and that the Department asked Aims of Industry and Mr. Malcolm Hoppé to investigate their hooks, and that when they did, they found nothing wrong and had to accept that this was genuine profit obtained by tendering in competition with private enterprise?
§ Mr. MellishI accept that and I think that it confirms what I said, that there is a great deal of good about directly employed labour, where—this is the key—management is efficient.
§ Mr. Chichester-ClarkI agree with the right hon. Gentleman that he is the wrong Minister in the wrong place at the wrong time. Why, if he cannot be questioned on this matter, did he make a public statement in The Times on this subject in October?
§ Mr. MellishI did not make a public statement on that matter. The question which his hon. Friend asked related to the period when I was a Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Housing and I referred the whole matter to the National Building Agency. That is the only part that I played in that. I am now the Minister of Public Building and Works—and a darned sight better Minister than some of them on that side would be.