HC Deb 06 May 1964 vol 694 cc1261-2
16 and 17. Mr. Hector Hughes

asked the Minister of Transport (1) what action he proposes to take as a result of the report made to him following the Transport Users' Consultative Committee's hearing in Inverurie on 10th February, about the withdrawal of certain train services between Aberdeen, Inverurie, Pitmedden, Kinaldie and Kintore:

(2) what action he proposes to take as a result of the report made to him following the Transport Users' Consultative Committee's hearing in Elgin on 11th February, about the withdrawal of certain train services between Aberdeen, Keith and Elgin.

Mr. Galbraith

We are studying these reports and all other relevant factors in consultation with my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Scotland. I cannot anticipate the outcome.

Mr. Hughes

Does not the Minister realise that it is very improper for him to answer these two Questions together, because the considerations affecting these two districts are quite distinct? Does the hon. Gentleman also realise that the loss and damage which these withdrawals are inflicting on trade, industry, commerce and employment in Aberdeen City and County is greatly enhanced by the secrecy with which these withdrawals are planned and carried out? The hon. Gentleman's Answer is a striking example of that.

Mr. Galbraith

The hon. and learned Gentleman is quite wrong, because there is no secrecy about it, nor have there been, any withdrawals. The Railways Board said that it wished to withdraw certain services, and there has been an inquiry before the Transport Users' Consultative Committee which has reported to my right hon. Friend, and my right hon. Friend, in discussion with other of his right hon. Friends, will shortly be coming to a conclusion on the matter.

Mr. Speaker

Mr. Boyden.

Mr. Hughes

On a point of order. Two Questions were answered together. Would you not allow me to put another supplementary question?

Mr. Speaker

The supplementary arises out of one answer. We cannot go on with it.