§ 35. Mr. Randallasked the Minister of Education what school building projects were submitted for the school build- 654 ing programme of 1963–64 by the Gates-head education authority; and why none were approved.
§ Mr. K. ThompsonOne new secondary school and the replacement of three primary schools were proposed. None of these projects was approved because my right hon. Friend had to give priority to more urgently needed projects in other areas.
§ Mr. RandallIs the hon. Gentleman aware that the approval of no projects for 1963–64 has caused considerable con-earn? In view of the study which he is carrying out, may I ask for an undertaking that Gateshead will be visited in order that an inquiry into the conditions of the schools may be instituted?
§ Mr. ThompsonWe shall certainly try to acquaint ourselves as fully as possible with the conditions to which the hon. Gentleman refers.
§ Mr. WilleyWill the hon. Gentleman take a day off during the Whitsum Recess and go to Gateshead to convince himself how moderate were these proposals and how appallingly badly this authority has been treated?
§ Mr. ThompsonThe authority has had building programmes in the last three years totalling £1,381,000. I hardly think that that is bad treatment. However, I am always glad to have an invitation to visit an authority.