§ 26. Mrs. McLaughlinasked the Secretary of State for Air if he has yet decided on a successor to the Beverley aeroplane.
§ Mr. C. I. Orr-EwingOur examination of the operational requirement is not yet complete.
§ Mrs. McLaughlinIs my hon. Friend aware that many people in the aircraft industry today are anxiously awaiting the result of these deliberations? Will he do all he can to expedite them so that firms which are endeavouring to get contracts in order to maintain employment may do so as soon as possible?
§ Mr. Orr-EwingI am aware of that. We are working towards a final solution as fast as we can.
§ Mr. de FreitasSurely, this is not fast enough? Is not the hon. Gentleman aware that this is now becoming a public scandal in the aircraft industry with all this continuing delay and the battle between the Government and the Air Council? Surely, if the importance of the mobility of our defence forces is recognised, a decision must be taken very soon?
§ Mr. Orr-EwingNo one is more anxious than my right hon. Friend to 1285 reach an early conclusion, but we must make certain that that conclusion meets the main operational requirements of the War Office. It would obviously be folly to order aircraft which are not going to meet the needs of the Services when they come into operational use.