HC Deb 25 March 1957 vol 567 cc791-2
23. Mr. Peyton

asked the Minister of Health on what basis merit awards are made to consultants; by whom such awards are recommended; and to what extent regional hospital boards who have to meet the cost are consulted.

Mr. Vosper

Awards are made for professional distinction and on the basis that 4 per cent. of consultants receive awards at the rate of £2,500 a year, 10 per cent. awards at the rate of £1,500 a year and 20 per cent. awards at the rate of £500 a year. The recommendations are made by the Advisory Committee on Distinction Awards. In view of the basis of the Committee's recommendations, regional hospital boards are not consulted upon them.

Mr. Peyton

Does not my right hon. Friend feel that there is considerable need for wider knowledge of how this committee makes its awards? When the award is a continuing one, does it not involve considerable uncertainty among consultants and the medical profession generally? Will he look at this matter again with a view to improving things?

Mr. Vosper

I am aware that some concern has been expressed about this matter before. As I understand it, the whole idea of the awards is that they are on a professional basis. If that is so, it would be difficult to accept the implication of my right hon. Friend's question.

Mrs. Braddock

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that, in the early stages of this scheme of merit awards, the details of those who obtained them used to be submitted to the management committee of hospitals, and that that has ceased to be done? Is it not a fact that at no time are the names of those who receive merit awards submitted to or known to the hospitals in which they are employed? Will the right hon. Gentleman reconsider the position to see whether it is not wise to start reissuing the names of those who receive merit awards to the hospital management committees concerned?

Mr. Vosper

It is several years since the names were disclosed. I understand that the change was made in the interests of patients and not necessarily of the consultants concerned. Of course, I will look at it again, but I think the disadvantages of doing what the hon. Lady proposes would outweigh the advantages.