HC Deb 07 March 1956 vol 549 cc2091-2
19. Mr. Gower

asked the Postmaster-General if he will take steps to discontinue charges made in respect of necessary inquiries to telephone exchanges.

Dr. Hill

The only such charge is that for advice on the duration of and charge for a trunk call, and I could not justify its discontinuance. If the comparatively few subscribers who use this service did not themselves pay the cost it would have to fall on telephone subscribers generally.

Mr. Gower

Will my right hon. Friend agree that it is rather absurd that a person should have to pay when he merely inquires the cost of a service? Does the Post Office regard subscribers as customers, to be treated as such, or as awkward people who ought to be thankful for small mercies?

Dr. Hill

My hon. Friend is not accurate in the statement that he makes. Anyone can inquire, without cost, the charge of a telephone call to a certain exchange. What we are dealing with here are inquiries in relation to a specific telephone call—the time it has taken—and, in large part, the object of those inquiries is for the internal purposes of the organisation concerned—quite proper purposes—including the allocation of the cost between one department and another. As the cost is about 3d. a time, it seems reasonable that the Post Office should make such a charge.

Mr. Gower

In view of the unsatisfactory nature of the reply, I give notice that I will raise the matter on the Adjournment.