HC Deb 10 July 1956 vol 556 cc168-9
5. Sir D. Robertson

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland why, in view of the magnitude of the problem, he approved slum clearance proposals by Caithness County Council for the three years to 31st December, 1958, at the lowest demolition rate and lowest new building rate of all 33 Scottish counties.

Mr. J. Stuart

The council proposes to build 120 houses for rehousing purposes for the three years in question, representing an increase from 33 to 40 houses a year in its average rate of building since the war. The county is remote; building is normally on scattered sites; and there are demands on the local building resources for other urgent purposes. In all the circumstances, the proposals were approved as being not unreasonable.

Sir D. Robertson

Will my right hon. Friend take another very serious look at this matter, because his Answer just will not do? Does he realise that it means that at least half of the people who live in these dilapidated houses are never likely to get a decent home in their lifetime? Does he also realise that the Burgh of Wick and the Burgh of Thurso are subject to the same difficulties about labour but are managing to tackle the problem within two or three years, instead of the 40 or 50 years suggested by the Question?

Mr. Stuart

I was dealing with Caithness County and not with the burghs, where the work is not so remote or difficult. The houses built by Caithness County compare favourably so far with the work done by other remote authorities. If it is shown that more can be undertaken, I expect the council will do so.