§ 7. Mr. E. Johnsonasked the Minister of Education how many new schools for handicapped children have been opened by his Department during 1955; and how many spastic children are being educated at these schools.
§ Mr. VosperExcluding replacements, 11 new special schools have been opened so far in 1955. None of these is specifically for physically handicapped children.
§ Mr. G. ThomasIs the Minister aware that there is a very real need of schools for spastic children, and that the only school provided for them in Wales is due to private effort? I believe that the position is the same in England. Will the Minister make an effort to ensure that private enterprise does not have to satisfy a real public need?
§ Mr. VosperAs the hon. Member probably knows, there is already a school in the programme for South Wales, and there are others in England. Indeed, several schools for spastics are in the current programmes, and by 1958 there should be no need for any spastic child to be kept out of a special school.
§ Mr. JohnsonIs it the policy of my hon. Friend's Department to discourage special residential schools for spastics only, and to group them with other handicapped children?
§ Mr. VosperThat is a rather large question. For the more severely handicapped spastic, I am sure that the special spastic school is the right answer; but 349 for the less handicapped, the ordinary school for the physically handicapped will, I believe, be adequate.
§ 18. Mr. M. Stewartasked the Minister of Education how many handicapped children are at present awaiting admission to special schools of a type appropriate to their particular disability.
§ Mr. VosperIn December, 1954, local education authorities report that nearly 19,000 children were waiting places in special schools, of whom over 12,000 were educationally subnormal children, but the great majority of these children were receiving education either in ordinary schools or at home.
§ Mr. StewartWould the hon. Gentleman agree that these figures underline the necessity of expediting measures for making use of the premises and staff of former approved schools, as suggested in the reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Salford, West (Mr. Royle)?
§ Mr. VosperYes, certainly, but it must be borne in mind that some of these schools are not premises suitable for educational purposes. We are looking into the matter at the moment.
§ Mr. RoyleWould it not save capital expenditure if some of these schools were used now instead of our waiting for the building of new schools?
§ Mr. VosperI will look at that point, but some are eminently unsuitable for use even at the moment.
§ Mr. de FreitasAre they not better than nothing?
§ Mr. VosperIn many cases the schools are still in use by the Home Office, and are not available.
§ Mr. R. BellCan my hon. Friend say how many of these children are awaiting admission to deaf schools?
§ Mr. VosperNot without notice, but a very small proportion.