§ Mr. AttleeMay I ask the Leader of the House to state the business for next week?
The Lord Privy Seal (Mr. Harry (Crookshank)Yes, Sir. The business for next week will be as follows:
MONDAY, 23RD FEBRUARY—Committee stage:
TUESDAY, 24TH FEBRUARY—Committee stage:
Motion to approve:
Import Duties (Exemptions) (No. 1) Order relating to synthetic potassium nitrate.
WEDNESDAY, 25TH FEBRUARY—Supply [5th allotted Day] Committee stage:
Civil Estimates and Estimates for Revenue Departments Vote on Account, 1953–54.
Debate on Development Areas and Distribution of Industry.
Motion to approve:
Distribution of Industry (Development Areas) Order.
1453 THURSDAY, 26TH FEBRUARY—Second Reading:
Report and Third Reading:
Town and Country Planning Bill.
FRIDAY, 27TH FEBRUARY — Private Members' Bills.
§ Mr. EdelmanCan the right hon. Gentleman say whether the general question of unemployment and redundancy in the engineering industry will be relevant to the debate on Wednesday?
§ Mr. CrookshankThat is a question which I cannot answer. It is a matter for the Chair. The debate is normally very wide on a Vote on Account, but I could not give any information about that.
§ Mr. Emrys HughesIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that there is a Motion on the Order Paper dealing with the question of the Prime Minister and Mr. Stalin? In view of the large number of eloquent speeches made at the last Election by the Prime Minister, demanding a meeting with Mr. Stalin, will the Leader of the House give some time to the Prime Minister to clear up the mystery of why his election promises are not being redeemed?
§ Mr. CrookshankI do not think there is any need for that. If I remember rightly, the Prime Minister gave the hon. Gentleman a full and complete answer.
§ Mr. H. HyndOn Wednesday's business and especially the Order which relates to the new Development Area in North-East Lancashire, can the Leader of the House say whether a reasonable time will be allowed for the discussion of that Order so that we can get some information about trade in that part of the country?
§ Mr. CrookshankThis matter does not lie entirely with me, but I understood that one of the reasons the Leader of the Opposition suggested a debate on Development Areas and the distribution of industry was to give ample time for that point to be covered.
§ Mr. RobensWhen do the Government propose to give time for a debate on matters connected with the Council of Europe?
§ Mr. CrookshankI have not forgotten about that, but I could not say yet when it can take place.
§ Mr. RobensDoes the right hon. Gentleman know that there have been great developments in the Council of Europe which demand the attention of this House? In view of the categorical assertions that time would be given which were made by the Prime Minister when he was in opposition and by the Home Secretary when in the Government, does not the Leader of the House agree that we really ought to have an early debate?
§ Mr. CrookshankI agree, but there have been a number of days available and the Leader of the Opposition gave priority so far as his time was concerned to other subjects. We have not been able to find any Government time recently. However, the matter is under constant review. I understand that certain drafts are being prepared. It might be as well to wait until we see what they are.
§ Sir E. BoyleWould my right hon. Friend say whether there is likely to be a debate on the Government White Paper on leasehold property before the House rises for the Easter Recess?
§ Mr. CrookshankThat is rather far ahead. We have still some way to go. We are only to the second day of Lent yet.
§ Mr. MorleyWill the Leader of the House arrange to give at least a few hours of Parliamentary time in the near future for a discussion of the proposed reduction in the grants for adult education?
§ Mr. CrookshankIf the hon. Gentleman is referring to rumours that he has seen in the newspapers—[Horn. MEMBERS: "No."]—he will have seen that they were connected in that context with the Estimates for next year. Those Estimates have not yet been published and I think we had better wait and see what they contain.