§ 29. Mr. Haleasked the Secretary of State for the Colonies why a charge of alleged murder by a British subject of a British subject in Kenya was tried by court-martial instead of by the civil courts; and what peace-time precedents were relied on for this decision.
§ Mr. LytteltonAs the incident occurred during the course of military operations the Kenya Attorney-General and the military authorities agreed that the case should be tried by court-martial; no specific peace-time precedent was relied on for this decision.
§ Mr. HaleDo I understand the right hon. Gentleman to say that there is no precedent of any kind in our books of history or of law for the trial, on a charge of alleged murder by a British subject of a British subject on British territory in peace-time, taking place by court-martial?
§ Mr. LytteltonI think the operative words are "in peace-time" The view of the legal authorities in Kenya is that these were military operations.
§ Mr. PagetIs it not a most unconstitutional practice to allow the trial by the military, on a charge of murder, of 363 civilians, and is it not highly regrettable and one of the very regrettable features of this case is that it was ever allowed to happen?
§ Mr. LytteltonI cannot agree with that.