HC Deb 30 September 1942 vol 383 cc757-8
29 and 30. Major Lyons

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of War Transport (1) whether, in the course of the investigation made, or being made, into the working of the Government Road Haulage Scheme, Sir Frederick Heaton has met, or taken evidence from, the Advisory Committee as representative of the Hauliers National Pool;

(2) when the report of the investigation into the working of the Government Road Haulage Scheme, made by Sir F. Heaton, will be presented; and whether evidence from the road haulage industry has been invited and taken?

Mr. Noel-Baker

When he decided to avail himself of the special knowledge and experience of Sir Frederick Heaton in this matter, my Noble Friend did not ask him to conduct any formal investigation into the working of the existing scheme. Accordingly, Sir Frederick Heaton took no evidence from the Advisory Committee, and no report will be published. I would, however, remind my hon. and gallant Friend that the Advisory Committee have always been at liberty to express their views on the working of the scheme direct to my Noble Friend.

Major Lyons

Is it not a fact that when the statement first appeared in the Press that this inquiry would be held, a report had been completed by Sir Frederick Heaton? What was the point of making this sham inquiry?

Mr. Noel-Baker

With great respect, I think my hon. and gallant Friend is incorrect. My Noble Friend asked Sir Frederick Heaton for an expert individual opinion on matters which he was then considering. My Noble Friend receives many individual opinions, and is always glad to receive them from any quarter', provided they are constructive and intended to promote the war effort.

Major Lyons

Will the hon. Gentleman say whether Sir Frederick Heaton will consider any evidence that the Committee bring forward so that he can make another report in order to make his first report into some resemblance to a proper report?

Mr. Noel-Baker

I have already explained that Sir Frederick Heaton was not taking evidence at all. My Noble Friend, who has to make the decision, will certainly take into consideration any evidence which the Advisory Committee may lay before him.