§ 64. Flight-Lieutenant Raikesasked the Minister of Pensions whether he is aware that the maximum sum of £7 10s., permitted as an emergency grant towards the funeral expenses of an ex-service man makes no allowance for the purchase of mourning and is therefore insufficient in all cases to discharge the costs of burial; and whether, in view of the hardship and distress suffered by families of service men and women, he will take immediate steps to remedy the situation?
§ The Minister of Pensions (Sir Walter Womersley)The expenses for which the funeral grant is designed are those incurred in connection with the actual burial. The grant is not intended to cover the purchase of mourning where this is desired.
Miss RathboneIs my right hon. Friend aware that it is impossible to obtain even the simplest form of funeral nowadays for £7 10s.?
§ 66. Mr. Bellengerasked the Minister of Pensions whether the emergency grant in cases of serious illness applies to confinement expenses?
§ The Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Pensions (Mr. Paling)A normal confinement without complications is not regarded as a serious and prolonged illness covering entitlement to an emergency grant. Where, however, there are complications or other exceptional features which entail unavoidable and unusual expense the case is within the scope of the scheme.
§ Mr. BellengerHas my hon. Friend any knowledge of what the expenses of a confinement amount to in what he terms normal cases; is he aware that they are very considerable for the wives of soldiers, and will he include them within the terms of the grant?
§ Mr. PalingIf they come within the terms of my answer, they are included, but they are being made at the present time.
§ Mr. BellengerBut only in so far as abnormal cases are concerned. The majority of cases are normal cases, and very expensive, too. Will the hon. Gentleman, therefore, not include them in the grant?
§ Mr. PalingAs the hon. Member knows, provision is made through another Department for normal confinements, and if we included them that would be duplication.
§ 67. Mr. Bellengerasked the Minister of Pensions, whether the emergency grant is applicable in the case of chronic illness resulting in continuing payment of doctors' bills and cost of medicine?
§ Mr. PalingAn emergency grant may be made towards the expense arising from the onset of a chronic illness, but continuing payments are best met by a weekly grant which takes them into account. The Ministry is always ready to deal with applications on these lines.
§ 68. Mr. Mathersasked the Minister of Pensions, whether, in view of recent improvements in allowances for the wives and children of members of the Forces, he is arranging to increase the amounts payable to widows and other dependants of men killed on service in this war so as to remove the disparity between allowances and pensions which is being made more acute by the latest changes?
§ Sir W. WomersleyIncreases in the pensions and allowances of widows and other dependants were made in February last and thus preceded the improvements in Service rates of children's allowances. The fact that these changes did not coincide in date does not justify a further increase in scales which are very favourable in relation to other schemes of compensation for death.
§ Mr. MathersDoes not the Minister realise that these pension allowances now fall far behind the allowances that were coming into the same home prior to the husband losing his life in the service of this country, and does not that prove to him and to the Government the need for an improvement in these pensions scales?
§ Sir W. WomersleyMy hon. Friend knows very well, because I have told him 926 time and time again, that a pension is an entirely different thing from an emergency grant. A pension in the case of a widow is an annuity so long as she remains a widow—it may be for the rest of her life; and in the case of the children it continues until they are beyond school age. I have to think of all that in fixing the rates.
§ Mr. MathersOn a point of Order, Mr. Speaker. Would it be right for me to tell the Minister that he is upholding a scandal that must be ended?