§ 55. Mr. McEnteeasked the Minister of Health whether the purchase by the Chingford Borough Council, in September, 1938, of 7.77 acres of land for approximately £10,000 for purposes of housing had his sanction; and what was the rateable value of this land previous to purchase?
§ Mr. ElliotThe proposal to acquire this land compulsorily was approved by me after a public local inquiry, but in January last the Council decided not to proceed with the purchase, and the compulsory purchase order was withdrawn.
§ Mr. StokesIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that that price represents £1,300 an acre?
§ Mr. ElliotBut that price was not paid.
§ Mr. McEnteeWill the right hon. Gentleman answer the last part of the question, as to the rateable value of the land?
§ Mr. ElliotI have just explained that the land was not purchased, and so that does not arise.
§ Mr. McEnteeBut surely it has a rateable value, whether or not it was purchased?
§ Mr. ElliotThe question is, What was the rateable value of the land previous to purchase? If there was not any purchase, the question cannot be answered.
§ 65. Mr. Bellengerasked the Minister of Health whether consent was given to the Ashby Rural District Council, Leicester, to purchase, as a housing site, 14,275 yards of land, with a frontage of 584 feet to the road at Measham, for £654 5s.; whether this area has now been acquired at the price named or at what other price; for what purpose had it been used; and what was its rateable value previous to acquisition?
§ Mr. ElliotI have given consent to the raising of a loan for the purchase for housing purposes of the site mentioned, and the land has been acquired at the price stated. The land was previously used for agricultural purposes and therefore derated.
§ Mr. BellengerCan the right hon. Gentleman say what is the basis of this price? Is it the price that would be paid by a willing buyer to a willing seller, or is it some fictitious value?
§ Mr. ElliotIt was the district valuer's valuation.
§ Mr. YorkIs my right hon. Friend aware that this land is not strictly agricultural land but accommodation land?