§ 48. Mr. G. Griffithsasked the Home Secretary by what authority the West Riding police, at the Barnsley, West Riding, court, took the finger prints and photograph of James William Burton, aged 17 years, when his father, who was present, refused to give his consent?
§ Sir S. HoareI have been in communication with the Chief Constable of the West Riding on the subject and am informed that Burton did not object to his finger prints and photograph being taken, though it was pointed out to him that he was at liberty to do so, and that his father, who entered the room while the finger prints were being taken, raised no objection when informed that his son had not done so. I cannot find that there was any irregularity in the action of the police.
§ Mr. GriffithsDoes the right hon. Gentleman know that Burton himself said to me on Sunday morning at 11 o'clock that he was in the office with his son and protested strongly against the son's finger prints being taken? That is straight from the horse's mouth.
§ Sir S. HoareI have information straight from the stable as well, and my information is directly contrary to the information of the hon. Member. I am quite ready to show him my information and to compare it with his.