§ 29. Sir William Jenkinsasked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education the number of technical schools and technical colleges in England and Wales in 1921, 1930 and 1937, giving England and Wales separately; and the
Numbers of Technical Colleges, Schools, etc. (excluding Art Schools), recognised by the Board of Education and Numbers of Students in Attendance. | |||||||
School Year. | Colleges. | Technical Schools and Evening Institutes. | Junior Fulltime Schools. | Total. | |||
Number of Institutions. | Number of Students. | Number of Institutions. | Number of Students. | Number of Institutions. | Number of Studenes. | Number of Institutions. | Number of Students. |
Full time | Part time. | Full time | Part time. | Full time | Part time. |
§ 30 Sir W. Jenkinsasked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education what number of applications has been received for technical schools; and what was the number granted and what was the number refused in England and Wales from 1930 up to the present date by local authorities?
Mr. LindsayI assume that the hon. Member refers to applications submitted by local education authorities for approval of proposals to provide new buildings for technical schools. As the answer involves
§ number of students full time and the number part time?
Mr. LindsayAs the answer consists of a tabular statement I will, with the hon. Member's permission, circulate it in the OFFICIAL REPORT.
§ Following is the statement:
§ a tabular statement I will, with the hon. Member's permission, circulate it in the OFFICIAL REPORT. I might add that no applications have been refused by the Board.
§ Sir Joseph LambWill that report give the distinction between senior and junior technical schools?
§ Following is the statement:
§ APPLICATIONS FOR APPROVAL OF NEW BUILDINGS FOR TECHNICAL SCHOOLS: FROM 1ST JANUARY, 1930, TO PRESENT DATE.
§ (These figures exclude Art Schools and extensions of existing Technical Schools.)
Approved by the Board. | |
Local Education Authority. | Number of applications approved. |
England. | |
Administrative Counties— | |
Cornwall | 1 |
Devon | 1 |
Dorset | 1 |
Essex | 2 |
Kent | 3 |
Lancashire | 1 |
Leicestershire | 2 |
London | 3 |
Middlesex | 5 |
Shropshire | 1 |
Staffordshire | 1 |
Surrey | 1 |
Warwickshire | 1 |
Worcestershire | 1 |
Yorkshire (West Riding) | 2 |
County Boroughs— | |
Barnsley | 1 |
Bath | 1 |
Birmingham | 1 |
Blackpool | 1 |
Bolton | 1 |
Bury | 1 |
Coventry | 1 |
Dudley | 1 |
Northampton | 1 |
Plymouth | 1 |
Sheffield | 1 |
Southport | 1 |
Stoke-on-Trent | 1 |
Sunderland | 1 |
Wolverhampton | 1 |
Wales and Monmouthshire. | |
Administrative Counties— | |
Carmarthenshire | 1 |
Glamorgan | 1 |
Moumouthshire | 2 |
§ No application was refused by the Board.
§ 32. Mr. Chorltonasked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education how much the new technical school at present under construction in Bury, Lancashire, is expected to cost; what grant his Department will make; also, with the declining trade, what number of students are allowed for ten years ahead; and whether any attempt has been made to obtain the necessary education required with other education authorities, and so save the cost of the new school and its effect on the rates?
Mr. LindsayThe cost of the new technical college at Bury is expected to 2410 amount to about £120,000, half of which will be met by grant from the Board. My Noble Friend is satisfied that the proposed accommodation is no more than is required to meet the needs of the future, as the college will be the centre for technical and commercial education for an important industrial area, with some 200,000 inhabitants. In formulating their proposals, the local education authority have had regard to the need for co-operation with other authorities, and for avoiding any overlap in the provision of technical education.