§ 52. Mr. Bateyasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what steps he proposes to take to remedy the anomaly which compels an aged couple to exist on 10s. per week?
§ Sir J. SimonI presume that the hon. Member is referring to the fact that the wife of a contributory old age pensioner does not receive a pension until she herself reaches the age of 65. I would refer him to the statement on the subject made by my right hon. and gallant Friend the Financial Secretary to the Treasury during the Debate on 23rd November last.
§ Mr. BateyThe reference the Chancellor of the Exchequer has given me is to a statement by the Financial Secretary to the Treasury on the whole question of an increase in pensions. In my question I am drawing the attention of the Chancellor of the Exchequer to one part of the problem, and the most important part. Are we to understand that the Chancellor of the Exchequer has no sympathy whatever in trying to remedy it?
§ Sir J. SimonNo, the hon. Member must not understand that at all.
§ Mr. BateyIf we are not to understand that, will he not take some steps to remedy this small anomaly?
§ Sir J. SimonI am afraid that I cannot add to the statement my right hon. and gallant Friend made the other day.
§ Mr. J. GriffithsIs the right hon. Gentleman not aware that there is a growing demand in all parties of the House that an end should be put to the anomaly of the wife having to seek public assistance?
§ Mr. GallacherIs the right hon. Gentleman not aware that he will have to deal with this question sooner or later, and that he had better do so sooner?