HC Deb 17 December 1934 vol 296 cc808-9
26. Major PROCTER

asked the Minister of Labour whether it is the intention of the Unemployment Insurance Committee administering Part I of the Unemployment Insurance Act to raise the allowances for children to a level commensurate with that contained in the regulations governing the administration of Part II of the Unemployment Insurance Act?

The PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY to the MINISTRY OF LABOUR (Mr. R. S. Hudson)

The committee are required by statute to make a report on the financial condition of the Unemployment Fund in the early part of next year, and I cannot at present forecast the conclusion which they may reach as to whether there is an available surplus, or the manner in which it should be dealt with.

Major PROCTER

Am I to understand that the position of the children of those on transitional payments is going to be more favourable than that of the children of those who are insured?

Mr. HUDSON

That depends upon the composition of the family.

Mr. ANEURIN BEVAN

Have not the Government power to ask the committee to consider a matter of this description, and, if so, do they propose to do that?

Mr. HUDSON

The committee was only recently set up, and it would not be fair to them to ask them to submit a report before they have had a reasonable time to see how the finances of the unemployment fund—with the care of which they are charged—are likely to run.

Mr. BEVAN

In the event of the committee itself not making any proposals in the future, will the hon. Gentleman give a guarantee that the Government will ask them for a report on this matter?

Mr. HUDSON

That is a purely hypothetical question.

Mr. THORNE

Has the hon. Member any objection to sending a copy of this question to them?

Mr. HUDSON

I have no doubt that the chairman of the committee follows the proceedings in Parliament quite closely.