HC Deb 10 November 1932 vol 270 cc480-1
3. Mr. MAXTON (for Mr. WALL-HEAD)

asked the Minister of Labour the number of applicants for unemployment insurance benefit whose claims have been disallowed during the last six months to the nearest available date on the respective grounds that they were not normally in insurable employment or under any one of the disqualifications imposed by the Anomalies Act; and the number of cases in which, by the operation of the means test, benefit has either been reduced or completely withdrawn?

Sir H. BETTERTON

As the reply includes a number of figures I will, if I may, circulate a statement in the OFFICIAL REPORT.

Following is the reply:

DISALLOWANCES by Courts of Referees in Great Britain, 1st April, 1932–30th September, 1932.
Ground of disallowance: Number.
Not normally insurable and/or will not normally seek to obtain a livelihood by means of insurable employment 66,749
Anomalies Regulations:
Class (b) Seasonal Workers 4,214
Class (c) Persons normally working for part only of the week 1,086
Class (d) Married Women 27,717
DETERMINATIONS by Public Assistance Authorities in Great Britain on applications for transitional payments, 4th April, 1932, to 1st October, 1932.
Initial applications Renewals and Revisions.
Payment allowed at rates lower than maximum benefit rates. 209,977 1,578,370
Needs of applicants held not to justify payment. 123,045 162,079

The figures relate to claims and, except as regards initial applications for transitional payments, the number of separate individuals concerned is not available.

I should all that transitional payments are not insurance benefit.

Forward to