HC Deb 24 February 1932 vol 262 cc364-5
14. Mr. G. HALL

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty why Leading-stoker J. W. H. Lee, His Majesty's Ship "Rodney," was dismissed from the service, after 19 years' service, without trial and without pension; and whether, in view of his service, it is possible to grant a modified pension?

Lord STANLEY

This man was one of 24 men discharged "Services no longer required" by order of the Board of Admiralty. The reasons for discharge were stated in this House in the reply which was given to a question by the hon. Member for Plaistow (Mr. Thorne) on 12th November, 1931. The answer to the second part of the question is in the negative.

Mr. THORNE

Is it not the case that the late First Lord of the Admiralty said that there would be no penalisation of men at all in connection with this matter?

Lord STANLEY

That is true; and there has been no penalisation.

Mr. HALL

Will my Noble Friend and the Board take into account the special circumstances of these men, and their long service, 19 and 20 years?

Viscountess ASTOR

Can the Parliamentary Secretary tell us why certain hon. Members will not allow Communists in their own party, but want them in the Navy?

Mr. THORNE

Is the Parliamentary Secretary aware that we do not allow Communists in our organisation?