HC Deb 09 February 1932 vol 261 cc658-9
Lord BURGHLEY

(by Private Notice) asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he proposes to take steps to stop the purchase of gold coin from private people at a premium with a view to its export?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

The residue of sovereigns and other gold coin in private hands cannot, even on the most liberal estimate, be large enough to require special legislation making transactions of this kind illegal. But I take the opportunity of saying that people who possess gold coins can best serve the public interest, not by selling them, but by paying them in to a bank or post office with a view to their transmission to the Bank of England.

Mr. LOGAN

What action, if any, will be taken against people who accept the offer which has been advertised of 27s. 6d. for each golden sovereign?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

I do not think there is any occasion for legislation.

Mr. KIRKWOOD

With regard to the question of the sovereign going back into the Bank of England, I want to ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what benefit that will be to the average member of the working classes, seeing that the Bank of England is a privately-owned concern?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

I despair of dealing with that question in reply to a supplementary question.

Mr. LOGAN

Is it not a fact that, if a private individual buys golden sovereigns of the realm to melt them, he is liable to imprisonment or a heavy fine, and why is it that it is allowed that a public office can advertise and buy gold coins which they require for no other purpose than for melting?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

Perhaps the hon. Member will put his question on the Order Paper.