HC Deb 19 March 1931 vol 249 cc2124-5
19. Mr. HACKING

asked the Home Secretary whether he will introduce legislation so that it may no longer be necessary for a person wishing to appeal against a conviction to lodge £40 or obtain two sureties for that amount?

Mr. CLYNES

While the Government have much sympathy with the object which the right hon. Gentleman has in view, the question raises very difficult issues, and would require the most careful consideration before legislation could be proposed. In view of the state of public business, I regret that I cannot see my way to introduce legislation to deal with this matter.

Mr. HACKING

Has the right hon. Gentleman's attention been drawn to the statement recently made by the Recorder of London when he describd the present position as one law for the rich and one law for the poor, and does he agree with that statement?

Mr. CLYNES

I have not seen the statement. I am well aware that in certain cases hardship arises, but I am at present unable to add anything to the answer.

Mr. T. WILLIAMS

Is my right hon. Friend aware that, although there may be plenty of law, there is very little practice for thousands of poor people pending the passing of some amending legislation?

Mr. CLYNES

The House has recently done much to lessen any cause for grievance under that head, and a little later might be prepared to do more.

Mr. MARJORIBANKS

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that in a case of successful appeal, owing to some technicality, no costs can be recovered, and that that is very unjust?