HC Deb 20 April 1931 vol 251 cc583-5
16. Mr. BROCKWAY

asked the Secretary of State for India whether in view of the truce he proposes to recommend the termination of the trial at Meerut of the thirty-one prisoners charged with conspiracy?

Mr. BENN

No, Sir.

Mr. BROCKWAY

In view of the fact that these charges are essentially political in nature, and no overt action of violence is charged against these men, cannot the right hon. Gentleman see his way now to release them?

Mr. BENN

The defence is being proceeded with, and I cannot interfere with with the ordinary course of judicial procedure.

Mr. BROCKWAY

Is it not the case that it is going to last two years?

Mr. BENN

That is so.

Mr. BROCKWAY

I beg to give notice that, in view of the unsatisfactory nature of the reply, I will raise this question on the Adjournment.

10. Mr. FREEMAN

asked the Secretary of State for India how many prisoners are still in goal for political offences; and whether all prisoners covered by the recent Delhi agreement have now been released?

Mr. BENN

I am circulating a statement showing the position on the 6th April except as regards Madras and Bengal in which cases the figures are up to 26th March and the 9th April respectively.

Mr. FREEMAN

Have all the prisoners referred to in the agreement been released by this time and, if not, why not?

Mr. BENN

I am giving the hon. Member all the information at my disposal.

Mr. FREEMAN

Will they all be released? If they have not been, will the right hon. Gentleman give the reason?

Mr. BENN

I have no reason to suppose that the terms of the agreement have not been fulfilled.

Mr. MARCH

Will they include the Meerut prisoners as well?

Mr. BENN

No. They were not covered by the agreement.

Following is the statement:

Civil Disobedience Movement.
Province. Prisoners released. Prisoners still in gaol.
Madras 1,564 79
Bombay 3,164 111
Bengal 1,853 60
United Provinces 4,453 120
Punjab 1,670 130
Bihar and Orissa 2,895 188
Central Provinces 824 104
Assam 213
North West Frontier Province. 581 18
Delhi 331 6
Coorg 18
Total 17,566 816

11. Mr. FREEMAN

asked the Secretary of State for India whether his attention has been called to the cases of Mr. Sabhraj and Swami Priyog Bharati, two political prisoners, who were asked to be vaccinated in Hyderabad gaol early this year and who refused on conscientious grounds; whether he is aware that they were handcuffed and then forcibly vaccinated, and when they protested their leave of gaol was cancelled; and what action he intends to take to prevent a recurrence of this incident?

Mr. BENN

I have no information, but will inquire.

17. Mr. BROCKWAY

asked the Secretary of State for India whether in view of the truce, he proposes to recommend the release of the 17 Garhwali riflemen serving sentences varying from three years' imprisonment to transportation for life?

Mr. BENN

The answer is in the negative. I would remind my hon. Friend that all cases of prisoners undergoing sentences by courts-martial are periodically reviewed by the military authorities.

Mr. BROCKWAY

May I ask whether the right hon. Gentleman will consider this point? Is it seemly for a Government whose principal Members—

Mr. SPEAKER

Sir Kingsley Wood!

Back to