§ 10. Mr. DAYasked the President of the Board of Trade what steps his Department has taken to give effect to the recommendations of the advisory committee appointed under the Cinematograph Films Act to prevent a monopoly of sound-recording methods?
§ Mr. W. GRAHAMAs my hon. Friend is no doubt aware, the situation is somewhat easier than it was, and while I understand that the advisory committee are watching it, I have not up to the present received from them any specific recommendations.
§ 23. Mr. BECKETTasked the President of the Board of Trade whether he 813 has now considered the position of the British film producing industry; and whether he is proposing to introduce any legislation dealing with the matter or to appoint any committee to investigate and advise upon the condition of the industry and the effects of recent legislation?
§ Mr. GRAHAMThere is already an advisory committee, appointed under the terms of the Act, which is constantly watching the course of the industry, and I shall of course give careful consideration to any recommendations they may make to me at any time. I do not think that any useful purpose would be served by the appointment of another committee.
§ Mr. BECKETTCan the right hon. Gentleman say whether he has received any report recently from that Committee, and has he satisfied himself that the terms of reference are sufficient for them to advise him on this important question?
§ Mr. GRAHAMI understand that reports are received from time to time. I have not recently considered the terms of reference. Quite plainly the Government cannot promise fresh legislation, but I will make inquiries on the point raised in the hon. Member's supplementary question.
§ Sir PHILIP CUNLIFFE-LISTERIs it not the fact that this advisory committee have complete authority to advise on any subject arising under the Act?
§ Mr. GRAHAMI think the right hon. Gentleman has described exactly the situation under the terms of the Act.
§ Mr. BECKETTIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that the reason why an inquiry is necessary is because the Act is a dead letter?