HC Deb 29 November 1928 vol 223 cc594-5
53 and 54. Lord HENRY CAVENDISH-BENTINCK

asked the Minister of Health (1) what provision in the form of relief is given to the unmarried unemployed man who has exhausted his claim to unemployment benefit;

(2) whether he is aware that an unemployed married man with two children in the distressed areas who has exhausted his claim to unemployment benefit draws out-relief of 16s. a week, being 10s. a week for his wife and 3s. for each child and nothing for himself; and will he take steps to increase this scale?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

The question of the form in which relief is to be given, or, where out-door relief is given, of the amount of relief, is one for decision by the board of guardians to whom the application is made.

Lord H. CAVENDISH-BENTINCK

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that in a leading article in the "Times," the other day, it was stated that an able-bodied man does not get any relief at all in a distressed area?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

I cannot imagine that that statement was made in the "Times."

Mr. LANSBURY

Is the right hon. Gentleman not aware that the inspectors are instructing boards of guardians that they are not to give out-relief to able-bodied single men, and only to give it for short periods to able-bodied married men?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

That is quite a different thing from the question on the Paper.

Mr. LANSBURY

Will the right hon. Gentleman say how this can be at the discretion of boards of guardians, when the inspectors tell them it is illegal to do it?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

The boards of guardians must act within the Regulations.

Mr. LANSBURY

Why does not the right hon. Gentleman tell them that?

Back to
Forward to