HC Deb 20 March 1928 vol 215 cc215-7
66. Mr. LANSBURY

asked the Minister of Labour how many persons not

A.—Number of Claims to Unemployment Benefit admitted and under consideration at the Stratford, Hackney and Poplar Employment Exchanges on each Monday of February, 1928.
Exchange. Date. Men. Boys. Women. Girls. Total.
1928.
Stratford 6th February 2,088 52 543 28 2,711
13th" 2,068 46 559 24 2,697
20th" 2,062 42 532 18 2,654
27th" 2,064 42 525 21 2,652
Hackney 6th" 3,017 56 970 43 4,086
13th" 2,966 59 1,006 43 4,074
20th" 2,999 40 915 34 3,988
27th" 2,869 60 847 36 3,812
Poplar 6th" 3,040 5 432 33 3,510
13th" 3,195 1 421 24 3,641
20th" 3,181 1 447 32 3,661
27th" 3,202 2 431 28 3,663
The MINISTER of LABOUR (Sir Arthur Steel Maitland)

As the reply includes a number of figures, I will, with the hon. Member's permission, circulate a statement in the OFFICIAL REPORT.

Following is the statement:

receiving unemployment pay were sent to vacancies notified by the Employment Exchanges at Stratford, Hackney, and Poplar; the number of persons receiving unemployment benefit; and the total number of vacancies notified during the month of February last?

Sir A. STEEL-MAITLAND

Statistics are not available of the number of persons actually in receipt of benefit, nor of the number of persons not in receipt of benefit who are sent to vacancies. I am, however, circulating in the OFFICIAL REPORT such figures as are available.

Following are the figures:

B.—Number of Vacancies notified to the Stratford, Hackey and Popular Employment Exchanges during February, 1928.
Exchange. Week ending. Men. Boys. Women. Girls. Total.
1928.
Stratford 6th February 22 6 25> 24 77
13th" 41 14 25 26 106
20th" 29 17 26 11 83
27th" 46 19 41 22 128
Hackney 6th" 40 33 80 29 182
13th" 58 83 84 38 263
20th" 76 49 99 32 256
27th" 38 39 78 39 194
Poplar 6th" 93 28 20 54 195
13th" 59 21 10 33 123
20th" 134 29 12 29 204
27th" 32 38 22 19 111
67. Mr. LANSBURY

asked the Minister of Labour whether he is aware that at East London Employment Exchanges it is impossible for persons not in receipt of unemployment pay to obtain any chance of securing the opportunity to apply for vacancies notified to the Exchanges; that persons in receipt of Poor Law relief are thus entirely barred from receiving any advantage from the Employment Exchange; whether any verbal or written instructions have been given to officials at the Exchanges that preference is to be given to persons drawing unemployment pay over those whose claims to benefit. have expired; and, if this is the case, what does he propose shall be done for the men and women thus denied all opportunity of finding work?

Sir A. STEEL-MAITLAND

There is no instruction that preference should be given to any person on the ground that he is claiming or in receipt of benefit. The practice in these as in other Exchanges is to submit the applicant who is industrially best qualified to fill the vacancy.

Mr. LANSBURY

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that in the East End it is absolutely impossible for a man or woman not in receipt of unemployment pay to get an opportunity of applying for one of these vacancies, and will he make special inquiries as to the truth of my statement?

Sir A. STEEL-MAITLAND

I will certainly make inquiries and see what there is in it.