HC Deb 09 March 1927 vol 203 cc1222-3
40. Mr. DALTON

asked the Minister of Labour if he has taken legal opinion as to whether the hours now being worked by any men or boys in or about the British coal mines under any district agreement are in excess of those permitted under the Washington Hours Convention; and, if so, whether he will communicate this opinion to the House?

Sir A. STEEL-MAITLAND

The answer to the first part of the question is in the negative.

Mr. DALTON

Would it not be desirable, in view of the opinions that have been expressed on the matter, to take legal opinion, so as to be quite sure that the Government are not responsible, owing to the Act that was passed last Session?

Sir A. STEEL-MAITLAND

I am considering the question at this moment.

Mr. MARDY JONES

Is it not a fact that, owing to the Eight Hours Act, the hours worked by underground workers exceed eight, and, therefore, exceed the number laid down in the Washington Convention?

Sir A. STEEL-MAITLAND

The hon. Member is giving me the legal opinion himself.

Mr. JONES

Is the right hon. Gentleman not aware that it is a fact? I know that it is a fact.

Mr. TAYLOR rose

—

Mr. SPEAKER

The hon. Member must wait, to give facts until he is on the Treasury Bench.

Mr. JONES

A fact remains a fact, whether one is in Opposition or in the Government.

Mr. SPEAKER

It is not a matter for Question Time.

Mr. TAYLOR

Did not the right hon. Gentleman state recently that the Miners Eight Hours Bill was not a contravention of the Washington Convention, and had he taken legal opinion before he made that statement?

Sir A. STEEL-MAITLAND

I never made that statement.

Mr. JONES

Is the right hon. Gentleman not aware that the Secretary of the International Labour Office at Geneva warned the Government and the country that the imposition of an Eight Hours Act in this country would seriously endanger the recognition of the Washington Convention?

Mr. SPEAKER

Notice should be given of that question.