HC Deb 07 March 1927 vol 203 cc816-8
63. Mr. TREVELYAN

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether it is the intention of the Government to refuse to allow the Cantonese troops to enter Shanghai if they offer to guarantee the safety of the foreign concessions?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

I cannot attempt to answer hypothetical questions of this kind. I can only refer the right hon. Member to the replies given on 2nd March to a question by the bon. Member for Camlachie (Mr. Stephen), and to a supplementary question by the right hon. and gallant Member for Newcastle-under-Lyme (Colonel Wedgwood).

Mr. MOSLEY

Have not other participants in the Chinese War been allowed to enter Shanghai, and will the Cantonese alone be debarred?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

No armed forces have been allowed to enter the settlement.

Mr. MOSLEY

Was not General Sun permitted to occupy Shanghai?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

No, certainly not.

Mr. THURTLE

Can the hon. Gentleman say whether any instructions have been given to the military commanders based on the hypothesis in this question?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

The whole point of British forces being in Shanghai is to prevent the entry of these armed Chinese forces.

Mr. THURTLE

Have these commanders been given any instructions as to what to do in the event of this contingency arising?

Sir H. BRITTAIN

Is not the best thing we can do to trust our naval and military representatives on the spot?

70. Mr. DALTON

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether any armed Chinese troops have entered or are at present within the lines occupied by the British troops at Shanghai; and, if so, whether it is proposed to disarm and intern them?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

No bodies of Chinese troops have entered or are within the lines occupied by British troops at Shanghai, apart possibly from isolated deserters or stragglers.

Mr. DALTON

Have any steps been taken to disarm or in tern the isolated deserters or stragglers?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

Yes; any stragglers that happen to come within the International Settlement will certainly be disarmed.

72. Mr. MOSLEY

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether General Chang Tsung-chang has established his headquarters behind the lines occupied by the British defence force; whether any troops of General Chang Tsung-chang are behind these lines; and, if so, how many?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

No, Sir.

Mr. MOSLEY

Is the report untrue that was published in the Press to the effect that this general had arrived at Shanghai with a train which also contained munitions?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

No, there are no Chinese armed forces whatsoever within the International Settlement.

Mr. MOSLEY

Has this general not been in Shanghai since the arrival of our forces in Shanghai?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

He may have been in Shanghai, but the International Settlement is only a part of it.

Mr. MOSLEY

Then is it the policy of the Government to allow participants in the war to enter Shanghai, provided that they do not enter into the International Settlement?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

Foreign Governments cannot possibly prevent anybody from entering the Chinese city.

Miss LAWRENCE

Will the Under-Secretary explain whether there are Chinese troops within the British lines?

Mr. LOCKER-LAMPSON

I can give a categorical answer to that question. Certainly not.