§ 33. Colonel DAYasked the Minister of Health if his attention has been drawn to the recent decision in the King's Bench Division, when it was decided that a guardian of the poor receiving treatment in the union hospital, but paying in full for such treatment, was not disqualified from holding her seat upon the board; and what steps have been 1093 taken by his Department with a view to this decision being brought to the notice of local boards of guardians?
Mr. CHAMBERLAINYes, Sir; my attention has been drawn to this case, which has already received wide notice in the ordinary newspapers and in those circulating especially among boards of guardians. I do not think it necessary to take any further steps in the matter.
§ Colonel DAYIn view of the importance of this decision, will the Minister consider writing to the different boards of guardians in case it has escaped their notice?
Mr. CHAMBERLAINNo, Sir; I do not think that is necessary. But, in view of the public interest which is aroused by the number of the hon. Member's questions, I have no doubt that any boards of guardians who may have missed the statements in the Press will now take note of them.
§ Mr. W. BAKERIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that his Department decided that this decision does not cover a similar incident at Bristol, and if so, does he not think that action is called for?
Mr. CHAMBERLAINNo, Sir; I do not know anything about the case in Bristol to which the hon. Member refers. But, in any ease, if there be some doubt, that appears to be a reason for not circularising boards of guardians.
Dr. VERNON DAVIESHas the right hon. Gentleman's Department decided that these charges are legally made? Have the boards of guardians power to charge?
§ Mr. SPEAKERWill the hon. Member put his question down?