§ 28. Sir WILLIAM DAVISONasked the Minister of Labour whether his attention has been drawn to cases in which trade unions in the engineering industry have placed limitations on the number of automatic lathes and other automatic machinery which may be operated by individual workmen in the motor and other similar branches of the trade whereby the output of the industry is handicapped as compared with the freedom from restraint possessed by American and other foreign workers in engineering trades; and whether he proposes to take powers to deal with the matter?
§ Mr. SHAWMy attention has not been drawn to cases of the kind to which the hon. Member refers. As the hon. Member is probably aware, there are agreed arrangements for the discussion of working conditions in the industry by the employers' and workers' organisations, and I see no reason to interfere in the matter.
§ Sir W. DAVISONIs the right hon. Gentleman not aware that the facts are as stated in my question—that there is interference with a number of men working with automatic instruments—
§ Earl WINTERTONOn a point of Order. When an hon. Member puts a perfectly proper question to a Minister, is he not entitled to ask that question without an hon. Gentleman on the other side calling out the most offensive term "rubbish"?
§ Mr. MILLSIs it not to be presumed that an hon. Member of this House asking a question in relation to a particular industry should know the elementary facts about that industry?
§ Mr. SPEAKERHon. Members will please allow me to conduct these proceedings. The interruption was quite irregular, and should not have been made.
§ Sir W. DAVISONI disregard the interruption. May I ask the right hon. Gentleman whether the facts stated in the question are not within his knowledge, and does he not think it desirable, in view of the urgency of getting the largest possible output from our factories, that he should take some steps in the matter to stop these restrictions?
§ Mr. SPEAKERThat is a repetition of the question on the Paper.
§ Sir W. DAVISONOn a point of Order. The Minister said there were certain means of dealing with this matter, and my supplementary question was whether he, as Minister of Labour, did not think it desirable that he should take some steps to deal with it.
§ Mr. SPEAKERI understood the Minister's reply to cover that point.