16. Mr. T. THOMSONasked the Minister of Pensions if he will suspend the reduction of pensions due to alleged errors in the original assessment of dependence until the Government has had time to reconsider a revision of the terms of the Royal Warrant?
§ The MINISTER of PENSIONS (Mr. F. 0. Roberts)I regret that I cannot see my way to accept the hon. Member's suggestion. Much the greater part of the review of pre-War dependence pensions is already completed, and I could not suspend the process at this late date without embarrassing the steps I hope to take to place parents' and dependants' pensions on a better basis. The whole question is engaging my attention and I hope to make an early announcement. Meanwhile, in addition to the arrangements for complaint and appeal intimated by my predecessor, I have given instructions that in any further cases of this class which may arise before the review is completed next month, 14 days' notice will be given to the pensioner within which to make representations to the: Ministry before any change in the pension is made.
§ Major ENTWISTLEIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that these errors which are alleged to have been made by the Ministry are only discovered sometimes five years after the original assessment, and then a small pension of, say, 10s. a week is reduced by a miserable figure of about 2s. a week, causing great resentment? Will he put an end to this niggardly and unnecessary practice?
§ Mr. ROBERTS1 am quite aware of the facts stated by my lion. and gallant Friend. In order to do what he wishes, I am making special inquiry, and propose to take fresh and definite action.
§ Captain BERKELEYArising out of the previous answer with reference to the period of 14 days within which a pensioner can appeal to the Ministry, 721 ay I ask if any steps will be taken to give the pensioner expert assistance in presenting his case, as a great deal depends upon that?
§ Mr. SPEAKERThat is a question which should be put on the Paper.