HC Deb 19 May 1919 vol 116 cc18-9
31. Lieut.-Colonel W. GUINNESS

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Agriculture whether the forthcoming rise of 6s. 6d. in agricultural wages was taken into account before the recent decision was arrived at to reduce the price of 2½-inch pit wood from 12s. 6d. to 9s. 6d.; and whether the timber prices will now be reconsidered?

Sir A. GEDDES

I have been asked by my hon. and gallant Friend to reply to this question. The answer to the first part of the question is "No," and to the second part, "Unless experience shows it to be necessary it will not be."

32. Lieut.-Colonel GUINNESS

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Agriculture whether the authorised price of 30s. to the importer of 2½-inch pitwood as against 9s. 6d. for the same article to the British producer gives a preference of over 200 per cent. to the foreigner over the British producer of timber; and what is the reason for this discrimination against British forestry?

Sir A. GEDDES

The price at which 2½-inch imported pitwood may be sold is not fixed as there is practically no market for it in this country. A considerable quantity of pitwood of this size is used but the demand is more than met by home-grown timber at prices below the maximum of 9s. 6d. per 100 lineal feet; therefore the question of preference does not arise.

Forward to