§ 36. Sir H. CRAIKasked the hon. Member for Sheffield (Central Division) if the suggestions made with regard to a general exchange of civil and military prisoners without counting the exact numbers have been further considered; and if he is now in a position to announce a purpose of initiating negotiations with this object?
Mr. HOPEI am sure that my hon. Friend does not realise that the effect of this suggestion would be to make a present to the enemy in Germans alone of at least 48,000 men; in other words, of the equivalent in man-power of considerably more than an army corps.
§ Sir H. CRAIKAm I to understand that the plan is set aside?
Mr. HOPEUntil this question was put down I had never heard of any plan for a general exchange of prisoners other than civilian prisoners being suggested.
§ Colonel Lord HENRY CAVENDISH-BENTINCKHas the hon. Gentleman considered plans for an exchange of those soldiers who have been in confinement since 1914?
Mr. HOPETo ask me whether I am considering a plan would not have much worth, because I have no power in this matter, but such a matter has been considered. The difficulties hitherto have, however, been found insuperable.
§ 37. Colonel Lord HENRY CAVENDISH-BENTINCKasked the hon. Member for Sheffield (Central Division) if he will state what is the total yearly sum spent by the British Government upon the British prisoners at Ruhleben?
Mr. HOPEThe total amount from the beginning of the war to 31st March, 1916, was £54,388 6s. 10d. I am sorry that for the current financial year no figures are yet available.