HC Deb 15 May 1911 vol 25 cc1652-3
Mr. LESLIE SCOTT

asked whether the Chancellor of the Exchequer's attention had been called to the inadequacy of bonding accommodation at many ports in the country; that at Preston, for instance, there is none; that at Newport and Cardiff the existing accommodation was, on the 9th instant, fully occupied, with the result that fresh arrivals were shut out; and that the dutiable traders, such as sugar importers, of the country have suffered much in consequence; and whether he will take steps to have permanent bonding accommodation provided at all ports where dutiable goods are likely to be imported, and make arrangements for additional temporary accommodation being provided as and where needed?

Mr. LLOYD GEORGE

The amount of bonding accommodation is regulated to meet normal trade requirements, and I have no reason to believe that it is generally inadequate for that purpose. Where it is shown to be insufficient in any particular place, applications for an increase are duly considered by the Board of Customs and Excise. It is, however, the practice of the Board not to grant additional temporary bonding accommodation which is asked for with the object of retarding the payment of duty in view of possible Budget changes. I am informed that there are ten bonded warehouses at Preston.