§ Mr. C. BATHURSTasked whether it was proposed, through the medium of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act (1908) Amendment Bill, to differentiate as regards contracting-out of the provisions of the principal Act in reference to way-going valuations between Scottish and English agricultural tenancies, and, if so, why; whether it was proposed to proceed with the further stages of this Bill before the Autumn Session; and whether, to secure uniformity, a similar amendment of the Agricultural Holdings (England and Wales) Act, 1908, was contemplated by the Government?
§ The LORD ADVOCATE (Mr. Ure)The answer to the first part of the hon. Member's question is in the negative; to the second part in the affirmative; and to the third part in the negative.