§ Mr. YOUNGERasked what allowance was made, in estimating the revenue from the new scale of Licence Duties, for a possible reduction of licensed houses m consequence of the increased charge; and what was estimated to be the number of houses so affected?
§ Mr. HOBHOUSEIn making his estimate of increased revenue from licences generally, my right hon. Friend did not overlook the probability that the higher duties would lead to a reduction in the number of licences; but he regrets that he cannot give a definite figure in the case of any particular licence.
§ Mr. GEORGE YOUNGERIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that the Chancellor of the Exchequer said last week that due allowance had been made for this factor in the estimate, and, therefore, I asked what the estimate was, and no answer has been given?
§ Mr. HOBHOUSEI do not think that it is possible to give a thoroughly accurate estimate in a case of this kind, where the reduction might be greater or lesser according to fluctuating circumstances so that only an approximate estimate can be given.
§ Mr. YOUNGERI asked for the estimate which the right hon. Gentleman made, and he has not given it.
§ Mr. HOBHOUSEMy right hon. Friend says he regrets he cannot give that.
§ Lord ROBERT CECILDoes the right hon. Gentleman say that the House of Commons is not to be given the estimate on which this tax is based?
§ Mr. HOBHOUSEYes, I think my right hon. Friend is entitled to make his own estimate, and I do not think that the Noble Lord is entitled necessarily to have that estimate given to him.
§ Lord ROBERT CECILI do not refer to myself, but to the House of Commons.