HC Deb 04 November 1909 vol 12 cc1982-3
Dr. RUTHERFORD

asked the Undersecretary for India whether he can say who presided over the inquiry held by the Government of the Punjab into the conduct of the police in the Gulab Bano case; whether it was held in secret; whether any of the witnesses were cross-examined; and whether it was upon the report of such an inquiry that the view of the two judges who heard the appeal was dissented from and the opinion of the only medical expert who examined the woman at the time of the alleged torture was disregarded?

The MASTER of ELIBANK

The whole of the facts on which the local Government arrived at its conclusion are set forth in its published Resolution, a copy of which I shall be glad to supply to my hon. Friend or to place upon the Table. The Secretary of State is satisfied that the inquiry suggested by the judges was conducted in accordance with the usual practice, and he sees no reason to instruct the Government of India to furnish him with further details.

Mr. MACKARNESS

In view of the very serious charges made against the police in this matter, and that from first to last they have apparently not been submitted to any cross-examination either in the sessions court or anywhere else, can the hon. Gentleman make further enquiry?

The MASTER of ELIBANK

In the sessions court the district judge had a full opportunity of considering the facts of the case. The Executive Government have satisfied themselves as to the manner in which the case has been conducted, and the Secretary of State is not disposed to make any further inquiries.

Mr. MACKARNESS

Will my hon. Friend lay upon the Table a copy of the proceedings in the court of the sessions judge?

The MASTER of ELIBANK

I will consider that.

Mr. REES

Will the hon. Gentleman say whether there was any interference with any decision, or whether there was not merely an inquiry following on a remark made or an inquiry suggested?

The MASTER of ELIBANK

My hon. Friend is correct.

Mr. BYLES

Does the Under-Secretary of State for India realise that he is putting a severe strain on the loyalty of some of his stoutest supporters by the answers he has given?

Mr. SPEAKER

That is of no public interest.