HC Deb 06 May 1909 vol 4 cc1213-4
Mr. RENWICK

I beg leave to move the adjournment of the House for the purpose of discussing a matter of urgent public importance, namely, the pressing need for dry docks suitable for large war vessels on the East Coast.

Mr. SPEAKER

I do not think that such a subject as that suggested by the hon. Member is at all contemplated by the Rule relating to Motions for the Adjournment of the House. The Rule contemplates something requiring immediate action, and the answer given this afternoon was that it would take some years to build a dry dock. It seems to me, therefore, that the two or three weeks which is all the time that would be necessary before the proper Vote in Supply could be brought before the House is really insignificant. All that the hon. Member has to do is to press the Government to put down the proper Navy Vote.

Mr. RENWICK

With all deference, Sir, the answer to my question was that there was no dry dock nearer than Portsmouth, and I consider that it is a very important matter that dry docks should be provided.

Mr. SPEAKER

The hon. Member may consider that. Everybody may have his own opinion upon that point. I have to consider whether the Motion of the hon. Member comes within the spirit of the Rule, and my opinion is that it does not, because an early opportunity of discussing the matter will offer, if the hon. Member takes the proper means of obtaining it.

Mr. ARTHUR LEE

Is it not the fact that the proper Vote has already been taken?

Mr. McKENNA

No; the Report has not been taken.