§ Mr. CHARLES DUNCANasked the Prime Minister whether he is aware that over 100 members of the Women's Freedom League have during the last three weeks stood outside the gates of the House of Commons, an aggregate of over 3,000 hours, for the purpose of obtaining an interview with him; and whether he can now see his way clear to grant the interview thus sought?
§ The PRIME MINISTERI am extremely sorry, so far as the personal comfort of these ladies is concerned, that they should have exposed themselves to so much inconvenience. I may say, however, that on 9th July I was handed a memorial or resolution by one of these ladies, and shortly afterwards I was requested to receive a further petition and remonstrance, which I offered to consider if it were sent to me. They were informed with all courtesy at the beginning of these proceedings that I did not see that any public interest could be served by my receiving 847 at this juncture another deputation on the subject. I understand, however, that the ladies are engaged in the assertion of an alleged legal right which is in train for decision by the Courts.
§ Mr. KEIR HARDIEMay I ask whether, as the object of the deputation is to impart information, the Prime Minister would not be willing to receive this deputation to see whether any new facts have arisen?
§ The PRIME MINISTERNo, Sir. If they can indicate any new facts I will consider whether they can be elucidated in a personal interview.