HC Deb 17 March 1908 vol 186 cc391-2

Resolutions reported from the Select Committee.

  1. 1. "That, in the case of the London United Tramways, Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with: That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill."
  2. 2. "That, in the case of the Ards and Bangor Railways, Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with: That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, on the condition that the powers to construct Railways No. 3 and 3A are struck out of the Bill, and that the fact that a deposit equal to 5 per cent. of the amount of the estimate of expense in respect of the remaining railways proposed to be authorised has been made with the Accountant-General of the Supreme Court of Judicature in Ireland be proved before the Committee on the Bill: That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."
  3. 3. "That, in the case of the Sligo and Arigna Railway Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with. That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, on the condition that Clauses 53 to 58, inclusive, are struck out of the Bill: That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with.
  4. 4. "That, in the case of the London County Council (Tramways and Improvements) Bill [Lords], Petition for Additional Provision, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with: That the promoters have leave to insert the additional Provision if the Committee on the Bill think fit."
  5. 5. "That, in the case of the Alliance and other Assurance and Insurance Companies [Lords], Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with: That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill."
  6. 392
  7. 6. "That, in the case of the West London, Barnes, and Richmond Tramways Bill [Lords], Petition for Bill, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with: That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill on the condition that all Tramways are struck out of the Bill in respect of which the consents of the Local and Road Authorities, to the extent to which they are necessary under Standing Order 22, are not proved before the Committee to whom the Bill is referred: That the Committee on the Bill do report how far such Order has been complied with."
  8. 7. "That, in the case of the Leith Burgh Bill [Lords], the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with: That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill."
  9. 8. "That, in the case of the South-West Suburban Water Bill, Petition for dispensing with Standing Order 128 in the case of the Petition of 'Metropolitan Water Board,' against the Bill, the said Standing Order ought to be dispensed with."

Resolutions agreed to.