§ MR. MACKARNESS (Berkshire, Newbury)I beg to ask the Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies whether the Secretary of State is in possession of any information enabling him to fix the probable date of the termination of the preliminary examination of Dinizulu, or whether any definite charge has yet been formulated against that chief.
§ THE UNDER-SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE COLONIES (Colonel SEELY,) Liverpool, AbercrombyNo, Sir, I regret that up to the present it has not been possible to fix a definite date. If the prisoner is committed for trial the indictment will, of course, formulate definite charges.
§ MR. MACKARNESSIs it not the fact that this preliminary examination has been going on for upwards of seven months, and that 100 witnesses have been examined on behalf of the prosecution?
§ COLONEL SEELYYes, the examination has been going on for a long time, and a great number of witnesses have 841 been examined; but at present it is not possible to say when this prolonged examination will be concluded.
§ MR. FLYNN (Cork, N.)Have any witnesses for this man's defence been examined?
§ COLONEL SEELYAs soon as the case for the prosecution it? concluded witnesses for the defence will be called.
§ MR. VERNEY (Buckinghamshire, N.)Have any definite charges been formulated?
§ COLONEL SEELYA great many charges have been brought, but definite charges have not been and will not be formulated until he is committed for trial, which is uncertain.
§ MR. RAMSAY MACDONALD (Leicester)Has this preliminary investigation to decide as to this man's guilt or innocence?
§ COLONEL SEELYAt present it is uncertain whether he is guilty or innocent; this is a preliminary investigation into various charges.
§ MR. RAMSAY MACDONALDBut the hon. Gentleman said witnesses would be called for the defence.
§ COLONEL SEELYYes, after those for the prosecution.
§ MR. FLYNNIs there any precedent in Colonial affairs for a preliminary examination lasting over seven months?
§ COLONEL SEELYI cannot say definitely, but I believe this is a very exceptional case.
§ MR. REESIs the gift of self-government to the Transvaal to be counterbalanced by the withdrawal of self-government from Natal?
§ COLONEL SEELYNo, and I do not think that question arises.
§ MR. MACKARNESSI beg to ask the Under-Secretary of State for the Colonies whether a Bill has been introduced into 842 the Natal Legislature for the purpose of d creating a special tribunal for the trial of Dinizulu; and, if so, with whom, under that Bill, rests the power of appointing y the Judges to form the tribunal; and n whether the law administered, and the rules of evidence applied, will be those in force in the Supreme Court of Natal.
§ COLONEL SEELYThe Bill has not yet been introduced and I am not, therefore, in a position to make any announcement. I hope, however, to be able to make a full statement before long.
§ MR. H. C. LEA (St. Pancras, E.)Is it not the general opinion of Members of e the House that the conduct of the prosecution of Dinizulu is vindictive and tyrannical to a degree, as well as absolutely abhorrent and contrary to the whole spirit of English justice?
§ COLONEL SEELYThe hon. Member b has possibly more knowledge than I of the opinions of hon. Members.