§ MR. ASHLEY (Lancashire, Blackpool)I beg to ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether, in view of the fact that Mr. Denman acquitted Madame D'Angely and Sub-Divisional Inspector Mackay stated in evidence that he had made every possible inquiry, 649 with the result that ho found Monsieur and Madame D'Angely bore high characters for respectability, he will direct that an apology be now tendered to Madame D'Angely for the treatment to which she has been subjected; or whether it is proposed, in spite of the above facts, that the charges made by the police are to be repeated before the Commission.
§ MR. GLADSTONEI am not in a position to admit the accuracy of the statements contained in the Question. The matter is one which I must leave to be dealt with by the Royal Commission about to be appointed.
§ MR. ASHLEYDid not the magistrate acquit Madame D'Angely, and did not the inspector state that she was a lady of the greatest respectability?
§ MR. GLADSTONEAll these facts will arise before the Royal Commission appointed to examine into the case.
§ MR. ASHLEYIs this lady to wait months for an apology?
§ LORD BALCARRES (Lancashire, Chorley)Is the responsibility of offering an apology to this lady to be diverted from the Home Office to the Royal Commission?
§ MR. GLADSTONEI take full responsibility for the whole, of my actions.
§ LORD R. CECIL (Marylebone, E.)Will the Home Secretary take care to have inserted in the Bill conferring powers on this Commission provisions empowering and requiring them to make a preliminary Report on this and the other cases?
§ MR. GLADSTONEThat is a matter for the Commission to decide. ["No, no."] I may say that if the noble Lord likes to raise the point when the Bill to appoint the Royal Commission is brought in he can do so.
§ MR. SLOAN (Belfast, S.)May I ask, is there any reason why the police should be excused from the common obligation which rests on all people who blunder?
§ MR. GLADSTONEThat is a question for the Commission. That is a matter 650 which concerns many people, many inquiries, and many Reports, and the whole of the circumstances will be under the review of the Royal Commission. At present I am unable to make any statement on the subject.
§ Mr. GLADSTONEWhen the Commission reports the hon. Member will see.
§ MR. VINCENT KENNEDYAre the three police constables who are implicated in this case still in the service?
§ MR. GLADSTONEYes, Sir.
§ LORD R. CECILAnd still on duty in Regent Street?
§ MR. GLADSTONEI am unable absolutely to say that, but I assume they are.