§ [SECOND READING.]
§ Order for the Second Reading read.
§ Motion made, and Question proposed, "That the Bill be now read a second time."
528§ DR. SHIPMAN (Northampton), who had a notice of Motion on the Paper that the Bill be read a second time upon that day six months, said that an understanding had been come to, and under the circumstances he did not propose to offer any opposition to the Bill, the promoters having agreed to accept the Instruction which was on the notice Paper.
§ Motion made, and Question proposed, "That it be an Instruction to the Committee on the North-East London Railway Bill that it hear the parties on the Petition against the Bill deposited in the Private Bill Office of this House on the 11th day of February last by the Promoters of the Hammersmith, City, and North-East London Railway."—(Dr. Shipman.)
§ Ordered, That it be an Instruction to the Committee on the North-East London Railway Bill that it hear the parties on the Petition against the Bill deposited in the Private Bill Office of this House on the 11th day of February last by the Promoters of the Hammersmith, City, and North-East London Railway.—(Dr. Shipman.)